Today I had to go through 4 big boxes containing hundreds of documents that involve a case where the city got sued for a person who was arrested and then release by the police and harmed himself. Most of the documents were lawyers letters back and forth but other items I had to look at were medical records and photographs. It apparently was a very big case that the city tried and lost at a jury trial. But the City felt that the judge made a mistake in explaining the law to the jury and the city was appealing that error. Even though the issues on appeal do not have to do with a lot of the material in the file, it still has to be assembled for the appeal. I began to work on it but could not finish and they told me a law student coming in next week would probably spend about two weeks putting the whole case in the proper order and making all the copies.
Monday, May 11, 2009
Today I reviewed some documents on a tax case. I went to the Registry of deeds and spoke with a title examiner who was recording information on tax documents for the City. I also watched as his used a computer system to run down information on a price of property was was being sold because the property owner owed too much money to the back. the attorney explained to me a little bit about the process of bidders needing to know how much money was owed on the property before they could bid. The Registry of Deeds is an old building but had huge tv's that displayed information scattered throughout the building. There was old dusty books but most people were using the modern computers at the building.
Sunday, May 10, 2009
Thursday, May 7, 2009
Today I worked on Civil rights case involving a City employee. It was a very large case taking up 4 draws of a filing cabinet, each draw held 3 feet of paper meaning it was more than 12 feet of just paperwork! I was asked to sort through the correspondence since January between the lawyers, court, and people involved in the case and it took more than four hours and was hundreds of pieces of paper including letters, motions, doctor’s opinion and expert reports. Some documents were marked “confidential” and the lawyer explained to me that when he spoke to different Departments in the City he had to mark certain things that way otherwise they could be subject to a law in Massachusetts that says almost all records held by the City are available to the public. However, because the case was in litigation he had things that he had to discuss with Department Heads in confidence so they are marked “Confidential” so that he could do his job and represent the City. But he said that he may still have to disclose the records to a judge “in camera” to make sure they could be kept confidential. A Judge could then make sure he was not violating the law. The lawyer told me he must always be careful to keep to the facts and his legal opinion on a case so that he does not make an inappropriate comment that could harm the city or its reputation. Even though I spent hours on the case, and even though he tried to explain portions of it to me it seemed way too complex.